Mental Health and Justice
  • Home
  • About
  • Workstreams
    • 1. Supporting Legal Capacity
    • 2. Community Participation
    • 3. Advance Directives
    • 4. Insight
    • 5. Metacognition
    • 6. Contested Assessment
    • Information
  • Research
    • Output
    • Resource
  • News
    • Events
    • Careers
  • People
    • Researchers
    • People
    • Service user involvement
    • Advisory Board
  • Contact
Category: Workstream 4
  • Home
  • News
  • Workstream 4
  • Surveying the Geneva impasse: Coercive care and human rights
      • Insight
      • Output
      • Workstream 4
    • Apr 16, 2019
    • by   admin
    • 0
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

    Surveying the Geneva impasse: Coercive care and human rights Wayne Martin, Sándor Gurbai International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Volume 64, May–June 2019, Pages 117-128 Researchers from Workstream 4, focusing on ‘insight’, publish a new paper in the International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, looking at the differences between ‘coercive’ and ‘non-consensual’ care interventions under the United

    Read more

  • Objectivity in science and law: A shared rescue strategy
      • Insight
      • Output
      • Workstream 4
    • Mar 26, 2019
    • by   admin
    • 0
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

    A new study by Matthew Burch (WS4), and Katherine Furman is published in International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (Vol 64, May-June 2019). Objectivity in science and law: A shared rescue strategy “The ideal of objectivity is in crisis in science and the law, and yet it continues to do important work in both practices. This

    Read more

  • Open Access Gateway Misevaluating the Future: Affective Disorder and Decision-Making Capacity for Treatment – A Temporal Understanding
      • Insight
      • Mental Capacity
      • Output
      • Workstream 3
      • Workstream 4
    • Dec 11, 2018
    • by   admin
    • 0

    A new study from MHJ researchers using in-depth interviews with patients/service users experiencing mood disorder. The study aims to understand how the future is experienced from the standpoint of severe depression and mania and how this impacts on decision-making capacity for treatment. It proposes that self -determination can be effected – both in severe depression

    Read more

  • Is Involuntary Placement and Non-Consensual Treatment Ever Compliant with UN Human Rights Standards?
      • Output
      • Report
      • Resource
      • Workstream 4
    • Jan 09, 2018
    • by   admin
    • 0
    Is Involuntary Placement and Non-Consensual Treatment Ever Compliant with UN Human Rights Standards?

    A Survey of UN Reports (2006-2017) Gurbai, S., Martin, W. In recent years, the issues of involuntary placement and involuntary treatment for mental health conditions have been addressed on a number of different occasions within the UN system. There is no unified UN position on the question of whether involuntary placement and treatment can be lawful under

    Read more

Follow Us
Tweets by MHealthJustice
Mental Health & Justice

Mental Health and Justice is a multi-disciplinary research initiative, funded by the Wellcome Trust, and addressing a cluster of public policy challenges that arise at the complex interface where mental health and mental healthcare interact with principles of human rights.

Explore
  • About
  • News
  • Resources
  • Collaborators
  • Research & Outputs
  • Service user involvement
Get in Touch
  • Contact Info
Follow
Twitter

© 2017 King's College London