Mental Health and Justice
  • Home
  • About
  • Workstreams
    • 1. Supporting Legal Capacity
    • 2. Community Participation
    • 3. Advance Directives
    • 4. Insight
    • 5. Metacognition
    • 6. Contested Assessment
    • Information
  • Research
    • Output
    • Resource
  • News
    • Events
    • Careers
  • People
    • Researchers
    • People
    • Service user involvement
    • Advisory Board
  • Contact
Category: Insight
  • Home
  • News
  • Insight
  • Mental Health and Justice colloquium 2019
      • Advance Directives
      • Community Participation
      • Contested Assessment
      • Insight
      • Legal Capacity
      • Metacognition
    • Sep 30, 2019
    • by   admin
    • 0

    Members of the Mental Health and Justice research project gathered across the workstreams, alongside participants of the Service User Advisory Group (SUAG) the Advisory Board and Bethlem Gallery, for the MHJ Colloquium 2019. Convening at the Wellcome Trust in London on 16 September, each workstream presented the developments and future areas of research to the

    Read more

  • Surveying the Geneva impasse: Coercive care and human rights
      • Insight
      • Output
      • Workstream 4
    • Apr 16, 2019
    • by   admin
    • 0
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

    Surveying the Geneva impasse: Coercive care and human rights Wayne Martin, Sándor Gurbai International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Volume 64, May–June 2019, Pages 117-128 Researchers from Workstream 4, focusing on ‘insight’, publish a new paper in the International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, looking at the differences between ‘coercive’ and ‘non-consensual’ care interventions under the United

    Read more

  • Objectivity in science and law: A shared rescue strategy
      • Insight
      • Output
      • Workstream 4
    • Mar 26, 2019
    • by   admin
    • 0
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

    A new study by Matthew Burch (WS4), and Katherine Furman is published in International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (Vol 64, May-June 2019). Objectivity in science and law: A shared rescue strategy “The ideal of objectivity is in crisis in science and the law, and yet it continues to do important work in both practices. This

    Read more

  • Open Access Gateway Misevaluating the Future: Affective Disorder and Decision-Making Capacity for Treatment – A Temporal Understanding
      • Insight
      • Mental Capacity
      • Output
      • Workstream 3
      • Workstream 4
    • Dec 11, 2018
    • by   admin
    • 0

    A new study from MHJ researchers using in-depth interviews with patients/service users experiencing mood disorder. The study aims to understand how the future is experienced from the standpoint of severe depression and mania and how this impacts on decision-making capacity for treatment. It proposes that self -determination can be effected – both in severe depression

    Read more

Follow Us
Tweets by MHealthJustice
Mental Health & Justice

Mental Health and Justice is a multi-disciplinary research initiative, funded by the Wellcome Trust, and addressing a cluster of public policy challenges that arise at the complex interface where mental health and mental healthcare interact with principles of human rights.

Explore
  • About
  • News
  • Resources
  • Collaborators
  • Research & Outputs
  • Service user involvement
Get in Touch
  • Contact Info
Follow
Twitter

© 2017 King's College London